Australia's First, and best, wine discussion board, and group ... Join Us!
Craig(NZ) wrote:There are good supporters of this site who rate wines on their own websites, but everyone leaves them to what they do best, which is giving an opinion of a wine from their perspective.
Yes but there is one real simple difference here. I rate out of 109 which is a superior rating system. Parker is faulty as he uses just a lowly 100 point system. 100 isnt even a prime number for goodness sake!!!!.
tonsta wrote:Craig(NZ) wrote:There are good supporters of this site who rate wines on their own websites, but everyone leaves them to what they do best, which is giving an opinion of a wine from their perspective.
Yes but there is one real simple difference here. I rate out of 109 which is a superior rating system. Parker is faulty as he uses just a lowly 100 point system. 100 isnt even a prime number for goodness sake!!!!
You have a valid point Craig!
Craig(NZ) wrote:Oh please.
Don't encourage him!
I am obviously not taken seriously just as max schubert was not taken seriously with his 'crazy' ideas. You will all come over from the dark side one day
Yours superiorly rated
C
