2000 Moet et Chandon Dom Perignon

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2773
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

2000 Moet et Chandon Dom Perignon

Post by Mike Hawkins »

2000 Moet et Chandon Dom Perignon – initial waves of yeast dominated the nose but subsided to reveal aromas of almonds, seaweed, vanilla and a hint of spirity-ness (if such a word exists). On the palate, this is certainly more open for business than many of its older brothers were on release. While it has the trademark Dom elegant mouthfeel, it lacks the acid spine that I love in the good & great vintages. That having been said, it has decent length, and it’ll be a toss up in 10 years time whether it or the 98 have peaked first. Save the 95, 96 and 99 for later. To be fair, this is an average Dom at best, but nonetheless, an enjoyable drink.

User avatar
Attila
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:50 am
Location: Maroubra-Sydney
Contact:

Re: 2000 Moet et Chandon Dom Perignon

Post by Attila »

Mike Hawkins wrote:. To be fair, this is an average Dom at best, but nonetheless, an enjoyable drink.


That is why I prefer the 2000 Grand Vintage instead for much less. It is maybe an even better drink.
Cheers,
Attila
"(Wine) information is only as valuable as its source" DB

User avatar
Maximus
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Central Otago
Contact:

Post by Maximus »

Thanks for the note Mike. I'm yet to try the 2000, but I've tried the '98 and '99. I was curious that you slipped the '99 into some of the more elitist vintages; judging from your tasting note of the 2000, it pretty much mirrors what I would come to expect in the '99. In any case, as you say, perhaps not the greatest Doms, but bloody enjoyable drinks nonetheless.
Max
-----
Avant d’être bon, un vin doit être vrai

User avatar
dazza1968
Posts: 444
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Perth Australia

2000 vintage

Post by dazza1968 »

I had a bottle just last week and i must say it wasn't as good as previous vintages i have tried....................Never less it was still great with sea food !!! :D

Regards Dazza
Some people slurp it,others swill it,a few sip on it,some gaze at it for hours ,enough now wheres the RED

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2773
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Max, the 99 is certainly not in the same postcode as 82, 85, 88, 90 and 96. But for my tastes its in the group immediately below, alongside the 95. I like it more than others do - perhaps its the appealing citrus notes.

Mike Hawkins
Posts: 2773
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 9:39 am

Post by Mike Hawkins »

Atilla, can't agree with you on the 2000 GV. I thought it was ordinary to say the least. So much so, it was on sale for 6 months at a dozen or more stores in NY for USD 28, and it didn't move quickly at that price. I bought a couple of cases and ended up giving away a dozen bottles to friends who don't know any better !

Cheers

Mike

Post Reply