Sensitivity to Brett

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Sensitivity to Brett

Post by Red Bigot »

A topic of interest at the moment, but very interesting that only one of the judges found brett in this wine:
http://www.top100wines.com/wines/showon ... ion=top100

The same wine was marked down due to perceived brett at the NWS.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

Croquet King
Posts: 343
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:44 am
Location: Sydney

Post by Croquet King »

My wife is very sensitive to Brett, so much so she married one.
Sorry about that but had to say it sometime.

User avatar
griff
Posts: 1906
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 4:53 am
Location: Sydney

Re: Sensitivity to Brett

Post by griff »

Red Bigot wrote:A topic of interest at the moment, but very interesting that only one of the judges found brett in this wine:
http://www.top100wines.com/wines/showon ... ion=top100

The same wine was marked down due to perceived brett at the NWS.


Interesting that the same judge found brett in this wine as well. I wish it mentioned the vintage as I haven't found brett in this wine in the past. The funny thing is that he markets this wine! :shock:

http://www.top100wines.com/wines/showon ... ion=top100

I wonder if he just doesn't like Coonawarra Cabernet? :)

cheers

Carl
Bartenders are supposed to have people skills. Or was it people are supposed to have bartending skills?

User avatar
Lincoln
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:30 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Lincoln »

3 judges didn't like it - how did it get a Blue-Gold???

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Craig(NZ) »

slagging brett is over rated
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
Lincoln
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:30 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Lincoln »

Lincoln wrote:3 judges didn't like it - how did it get a Blue-Gold???


Actually 4. Very strange

User avatar
Lincoln
Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 8:30 am
Location: Brisbane

Post by Lincoln »

Craig(NZ) wrote:slagging brett is over rated


Saying "over rated" is over rated too :-)

User avatar
KMP
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2004 4:02 am
Location: Expat, now in San Diego, California
Contact:

Post by KMP »

You have to wonder what these folks are smelling in the wine that might be at all similar!

Paul White
Lots of leafy tobacco characters and positive herbal elements. Almost some spicy mint tea and lots of redcurrant, blackcurrant characters.
Neil Hadley
The nose has a lovely, warm, chocolaty and black olive character.
Stephen Harris
Classic aged Coonawarra Cabernet nose. Some curranty, leafy fruit then cigar box and earthy, leathery characters.
John Ellis
Minty, which dominates the character of the wine.
Mary Ewing-Mulligan
Initially this wine seems rather lean and vegetal on the nose. With air, it expresses some complexity although it is green.
Adrian Atkinson
Real barnyard notes to the nose. Violets on the palate which dries out and leaves little of the fruit. Bretty and confrontational with the food.

Perhaps something within that mix of leafy-olive-vegetal-earthy aromas, or it could all just be mint. :P

Mike

User avatar
Red Bigot
Posts: 2824
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 7:33 pm
Location: Canberra
Contact:

Post by Red Bigot »

Lincoln wrote:
Craig(NZ) wrote:slagging brett is over rated


Saying "over rated" is over rated too :-)


Is rating out of 109 "over rated" too? 8) :lol:
Last edited by Red Bigot on Tue Mar 06, 2007 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers
Brian
Life's too short to drink white wine and red wine is better for you too! :-)

User avatar
Craig(NZ)
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Craig(NZ) »

Is rating out of 109 is "over rated" too?
:shock:

like wotever!!! Bet you all are members of the flat earth society too.

Rating out of 109 is the future. In the world of rising premium wine prices it has become difficult for many of us to afford to drink 95-100 point wines on a friday night. Rating out of 109 clearly resolves this issue.

It is more accurate, as it is a prime number. It is so singular and so perfect. Surely this logic cant escape anyone except for the most retarded amongst us

100 points is just so yesterday. One day the world will catch up.
Follow me on Vivino for tasting notes Craig Thomson

User avatar
simm
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:05 am
Location: Sydney

Post by simm »

I don't know how you can judge a wine on its own merits when its profiles are affected by the food you're eating along side it. Blue gold for what, the match, or for making a stand and getting drier and more austere despite the food? That'll teach them. :roll:
simm.

"I ain't drunk! I' still drinkin' !!"

Olivier Collin
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 3:41 pm
Location: Montréal , Canada
Contact:

Post by Olivier Collin »

It seems strange, though, that only one judge would be sensitive to brett while the others describe a very classic Connawarra Cabernet... I also note that the jury disagrees on the wine-food match! Tough life to be judge in a wine show...

Post Reply