TN: 2004 SEPPELT Original Sparkling Shiraz
TN: 2004 SEPPELT Original Sparkling Shiraz
New release.
Colour very dark cherry red, nearing on black. After pouring, the froth settles quickly and the effervescent bubbles soon go very quiet. Vigorous palate of red berries with a hint of licorice. Fresh dark cherries and a little bit of plum. Refreshing, medium bodied with fine tannins and good focus but this sparkling red is simply undeveloped and lacking a long finish. This example under cork tasted sound but as it is not terribly exciting now, you need to cellar it for 3 years to see it develop. It doesn’t have the wonderful depth of the 1998 or the flavour packed intensity of the crown sealed 2002. (There is considerable bottle variation under cork for that wine)
I do get the feeling that the 2004 was released too soon but I must admit at AUD $14 I can’t complain. A good wine but right now not much excitement to offer. I like the fact that it tasted drier than the 2002 and the acid structure is quite fine. These are early days, open one to see what’s going on and then leave the rest in the cellar to improve. It may reach 92 points in a couple of year’s time.
Cheers,
Attila
Tasted: November 2006
Colour very dark cherry red, nearing on black. After pouring, the froth settles quickly and the effervescent bubbles soon go very quiet. Vigorous palate of red berries with a hint of licorice. Fresh dark cherries and a little bit of plum. Refreshing, medium bodied with fine tannins and good focus but this sparkling red is simply undeveloped and lacking a long finish. This example under cork tasted sound but as it is not terribly exciting now, you need to cellar it for 3 years to see it develop. It doesn’t have the wonderful depth of the 1998 or the flavour packed intensity of the crown sealed 2002. (There is considerable bottle variation under cork for that wine)
I do get the feeling that the 2004 was released too soon but I must admit at AUD $14 I can’t complain. A good wine but right now not much excitement to offer. I like the fact that it tasted drier than the 2002 and the acid structure is quite fine. These are early days, open one to see what’s going on and then leave the rest in the cellar to improve. It may reach 92 points in a couple of year’s time.
Cheers,
Attila
Tasted: November 2006
"(Wine) information is only as valuable as its source" DB
Has anyone seen any brett in the 04? Yesterday openned the third bottle of the case - didn't seem as good as previous 2 - had a slightly odd finish (but not on every mouthful ) Am I seeing brett or is it just an odd bottle?
David J
Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake 1Ti 5:23
Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake 1Ti 5:23
-
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 5:04 pm
- Location: Sydney
Actually, has anyone seen the 04 in a crown seal yet? I've been waiting for this version but haven't seen any to date. No need to say where, I just want to know if they've done this bottling run yet.
Cheers,
Kris
There's a fine wine between pleasure and pain
(Stolen from the graffiti in the ladies loos at Pegasus Bay winery)
Kris
There's a fine wine between pleasure and pain
(Stolen from the graffiti in the ladies loos at Pegasus Bay winery)
I have had 3 bottles of the 04 so far; 1 under cork, and 2 under crown seal.
The bottle under cork was clean as a whistle, but far inferior to the other two, being green and astringent and not enjoyable.
The bottles under crown actually enjoyed a (very) small amount of Brett. I say enjoyed, because I feel the Brett actually added to the complexity of the wine without detracting from it in any way. And I'm a Brett Nazi! The wine had good fruit and tannin structure, but was still quite primary with noticeable acid.
So, based on my experience, I recommend the crown seal. Here in Brisbane, one of the supermarket chains has been stocking only the crown seal for some time now.
Stuart
The bottle under cork was clean as a whistle, but far inferior to the other two, being green and astringent and not enjoyable.
The bottles under crown actually enjoyed a (very) small amount of Brett. I say enjoyed, because I feel the Brett actually added to the complexity of the wine without detracting from it in any way. And I'm a Brett Nazi! The wine had good fruit and tannin structure, but was still quite primary with noticeable acid.
So, based on my experience, I recommend the crown seal. Here in Brisbane, one of the supermarket chains has been stocking only the crown seal for some time now.
Stuart
-
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 5:04 pm
- Location: Sydney
Stuart, I didn't find any Brett in the 04. If you did you should be worried about buying it from a bottlo in Brisvegas after any period of time. Besdies that, it is what it is and you can't expect it to be the benchmark for all Aus Sp Sh, but for the under $20 go right ahead. The 04 is copping the same kind of complaints the 02 did when it was first released compared to the 99. I have no doubts that it will settle and I will have no problems sticking some 04 crown seal in the cellar for a few years. Enjoy it's fun, because although not an intellectual wine, it's more often than not a no brainer ( ).beef wrote:I have had 3 bottles of the 04 so far; 1 under cork, and 2 under crown seal.
The bottle under cork was clean as a whistle, but far inferior to the other two, being green and astringent and not enjoyable.
The bottles under crown actually enjoyed a (very) small amount of Brett. I say enjoyed, because I feel the Brett actually added to the complexity of the wine without detracting from it in any way. And I'm a Brett Nazi! The wine had good fruit and tannin structure, but was still quite primary with noticeable acid.
So, based on my experience, I recommend the crown seal. Here in Brisbane, one of the supermarket chains has been stocking only the crown seal for some time now.
Stuart
simm.
"I ain't drunk! I' still drinkin' !!"
"I ain't drunk! I' still drinkin' !!"
simm wrote:Stuart, I didn't find any Brett in the 04. If you did you should be worried about buying it from a bottlo in Brisvegas after any period of time. Besdies that, it is what it is and you can't expect it to be the benchmark for all Aus Sp Sh, but for the under $20 go right ahead. The 04 is copping the same kind of complaints the 02 did when it was first released compared to the 99. I have no doubts that it will settle and I will have no problems sticking some 04 crown seal in the cellar for a few years. Enjoy it's fun, because although not an intellectual wine, it's more often than not a no brainer ( ).beef wrote:I have had 3 bottles of the 04 so far; 1 under cork, and 2 under crown seal.
The bottle under cork was clean as a whistle, but far inferior to the other two, being green and astringent and not enjoyable.
The bottles under crown actually enjoyed a (very) small amount of Brett. I say enjoyed, because I feel the Brett actually added to the complexity of the wine without detracting from it in any way. And I'm a Brett Nazi! The wine had good fruit and tannin structure, but was still quite primary with noticeable acid.
So, based on my experience, I recommend the crown seal. Here in Brisbane, one of the supermarket chains has been stocking only the crown seal for some time now.
Stuart
I probably didn't make it clear that I really like this wine, and will certainly be buying a bunch of it (under crown).
Regarding the Brett, I am a complete Nazi. I often detect it where nobody else does. For example, I thought the 2002 Penfolds Bin 128 was riddled with it.
Maybe I'm just insane.
Either way, I thought the Brett levels in the 04 OSS were miniscule, so most people probably won't notice them.
Stuart