TN: Peter Lehmann Barossa Cabernet Sauvignon 2002

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
Post Reply
Grinners
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 4:51 pm

TN: Peter Lehmann Barossa Cabernet Sauvignon 2002

Post by Grinners »

Opened bottle and based on taste decided it didnt need a decanter.

Aromas that were popping into my head were dried herbs and cloves followed by a strong healthy whack of good fruit - promising. Tannins were fully intergrated and dissolved and subsequently the palate was very smooth.

Colour - getting towards brick red, no purple hues.

Long finish and initially the fruit was completely outplaying any oak - thinking awesome value.

About 1/4 of the way through (45 minutes), some oak reared its ugly head, briefly subsided but from then on the fruit was comparatively less noticeable and i down graded my experience from extremely pleasant to very nice.

Decided to decant *Shrugs - maybe this will help?* --> no it didnt. Oak became overpowering and distasteful.

I assume this means that the wine probably wont last much longer....

I'd be interested in anyone elses recent impressions....

Signing out :!:

winetastic
Posts: 889
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:51 pm
Location: Sydney

Post by winetastic »

TN from February:

Full bodied cabernet with plenty of juicy fruit flavours, especially blackcurrant. The finish is quite long and ends up nice and dry to balance out the fruity palate. After a little time in the decanter, there were definite mint chocolate and vanilla aromas lurking in the glass.

Opened bottle and based on taste decided it didnt need a decanter.


Being a bit of a nazi here, but I think it should read: "... decided it didnt need to be decanted".

Post Reply