China Tariffs

The place on the web to chat about wine, Australian wines, or any other wines for that matter
User avatar
Waiters Friend
Posts: 2746
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 4:09 am
Location: Perth WA

China Tariffs

Post by Waiters Friend »

Signs of a reprieve in the near-ish future?

https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/chi ... 7061&ei=27
Wine, women and song. Ideally, you can experience all three at once.

WineRick
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:25 pm

Re: China Tariffs

Post by WineRick »

Still way too many vines in the ground for growers to make a decent living. Also, I think that Accolade, and other companies, grower contracts need to be scrutinised - "Sorry, we can't take your grapes "Changed Market Conditions" clause, but hey, we'll give you $130 / tonne! Treasury can't openly buy grapes at these prices as they are a publicly listed company .... but Accolade can.

What's happening now happened in 1963/64, 1973/74/75/76 (Riesling boom), late 1970's (Chardonnay boom), 1984/85/86 (Shiraz $180/tonne and less - Vine pull.) right up to 2020's (lets blame China). I've experienced them all, starting as a 10 y.o.
Large wine companies love gluts!! They historically have controlled our industry, and industry bodies.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by phillisc »

WR...I'm stumped at your view on large companies loving wine gluts. I am trying to process in my head why this might be.
Can you shed any light on this please? Is it that they can drip feed stock, as they have large volumes tucked away somewhere?
Cheers Craig
Tomorrow will be a good day

Sean
Posts: 1408
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 11:32 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Sean »

deleted
Last edited by Sean on Tue Jul 16, 2024 10:08 pm, edited 3 times in total.

WineRick
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:25 pm

Re: China Tariffs

Post by WineRick »

phillisc wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:47 am WR...I'm stumped at your view on large companies loving wine gluts. I am trying to process in my head why this might be.
Can you shed any light on this please? Is it that they can drip feed stock, as they have large volumes tucked away somewhere?
Cheers Craig
Wine gluts lead to grape surpluses.
When there's oversupply, a tonne of warm area Shiraz can be snapped up for $150/tonne (even though it costs about $250/tonne to grow)
In boom years, or years of short supply, that same tonne could fetch $1800 - 2000.

BHCC1
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2017 11:39 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by BHCC1 »

Geez WineRick - wish I could grow grapes for $250 per tonne. That doesn’t even cover picking costs!

WineRick
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:25 pm

Re: China Tariffs

Post by WineRick »

BHCC1 wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 6:15 pm Geez WineRick - wish I could grow grapes for $250 per tonne. That doesn’t even cover picking costs!
Exactly! Our warm area growers are some of the most efficient in the world regarding their quality, and they do it without any Govt. subsidies.

What annoys me is that our two largest supermarket chains are draining the EU wine lake with many broad, basic appellations - and no doubt EU subsidised - at huge mark-ups on cost but still under $30! A number of high-end restaurant chains are doing the same but need to have a 'somm' on the floor to explain these obscure labels that sell around $75 - 85/bot., having been bought for a few euros.

France is biting the bullet and pulling up thousands of hectares of vines - Australia needs to follow. And don't ever go down the accelerated vineyard depreciation scam road again, which brought in the carpet-baggers!

WineRick
Posts: 221
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:25 pm

Re: China Tariffs

Post by WineRick »

And don't get me started on the 'dollar-a-litre-milk' scandal!

JamieAdelaide
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:59 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JamieAdelaide »

You’d be a mug building your business in China not believing the tap won’t be turned off again. Australia will always face confrontation with the CCCP. It’s not a market to ignore obviously. Just needs a more opportunistic approach and a mature realisation you can’t bleat when geo-politics has the ban in place again.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by phillisc »

WineRick wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:30 am
phillisc wrote: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:47 am WR...I'm stumped at your view on large companies loving wine gluts. I am trying to process in my head why this might be.
Can you shed any light on this please? Is it that they can drip feed stock, as they have large volumes tucked away somewhere?
Cheers Craig
Wine gluts lead to grape surpluses.
When there's oversupply, a tonne of warm area Shiraz can be snapped up for $150/tonne (even though it costs about $250/tonne to grow)
In boom years, or years of short supply, that same tonne could fetch $1800 - 2000.
So that may translate in to cheaper sales to the multi-national. It seems OK to pay a grower a premium when there is a shortage...supply/demand and all that...but in a glut haven't seen much activity on the price front for consumers...perhaps with China toying with Australia and 2.7 billion bottles that don't have a home...the dam is about to burst/bust? Certainly a flood of crap from 2017 and 2020.

Cheers Craig
Last edited by phillisc on Fri Mar 15, 2024 12:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Tomorrow will be a good day

Ian S
Posts: 2689
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:21 am
Location: Norwich, England

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Ian S »

Maybe we'll see the return of the cleanskin, as a way of disposing of surplus without openly trashing the brand?

felixp21
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 10:32 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by felixp21 »

China's economy is far far worse than the West think and Beijing will admit to.
Horrendous.
The Chinese GDP and growth rates are, at best, a loose approximation, as it is still very much a cash society, or better described as a red packet society.
The plumber will charge you $30 for his services, but you then need to hand over a further $80-100 cash depending on what has been repaired. And it is not just tradies, its everyone. An obstetrician will charge a total of $200 for the entire confinement and delivery, but then if you have chosen a top doctor, you need to hand over the red packet with a further $3000.

So forget inflation and growth over there, go talk to the man in the street. Businesses are closing everywhere, and upper middle class China, 200,000,000 of them, are doing it real tough. They are the ones buying wine, to show off their success mainly, and that avenue of sales is dramatically reduced.

The Aussies will find this an incredibly tough market when they return, and IMO, are in for a very, very rude shock.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by phillisc »

Felix, perhaps I am just a simple or hopeful lad.
I still think there is plenty of options in the domestic market...if only wineries here want to play.
Or that the recent mistake, where a few of us picked up Seppelts Sparking Shiraz for 80% off, may occur more frequently :wink: :wink:

I know precious little about China, apart from the many students that I engage with, in the higher education space.
However, your figure of 200M seems somewhat conservative of those doing it tough, what about the 800-900M who supposedly, don't imbibe?

Cheers Craig
Tomorrow will be a good day

felixp21
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 10:32 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by felixp21 »

my 200,000,000 is the upper middle class, not those doing it tough.
I'd reckon 1.4 billion are doing it tough at the moment lol.

selling lots of wine to the Chinese at the moment is going to be tough!!

JamieAdelaide
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:59 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JamieAdelaide »

phillisc wrote: Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:50 pm
I still think there is plenty of options in the domestic market...if only wineries here want to play.
Or that the recent mistake, where a few of us picked up Seppelts Sparking Shiraz for 80% off….
Aren’t you dooming the industry if you think domestic options involve your recent discounts? Now granted, it’s been a pricing and marketing pisstake locally for some time.

I spent two weeks a month in China for 20 years and now I spend two weeks a month in the USA. Wow! Fascinating to see where we may have gone wrong. Aussie wine in the USA was either cult or cheap as once the cult went away you are left with cheap. And frankly, South American table wines ( Italy too ) represent amazing relative value, interest, quality and food durability versus our cheap wines. Many of which are made in the mirror of the flabby cults.

China was an odd market. Penfolds obviously smashed it but many Aussies sat on shelves for years beyond their expiry for their style.

We really seemed lost as an identity abroad.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by phillisc »

JamieAdelaide wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:04 am
phillisc wrote: Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:50 pm
I still think there is plenty of options in the domestic market...if only wineries here want to play.
Or that the recent mistake, where a few of us picked up Seppelts Sparking Shiraz for 80% off….
Aren’t you dooming the industry if you think domestic options involve your recent discounts? Now granted, it’s been a pricing and marketing pisstake locally for some time.

I spent two weeks a month in China for 20 years and now I spend two weeks a month in the USA. Wow! Fascinating to see where we may have gone wrong. Aussie wine in the USA was either cult or cheap as once the cult went away you are left with cheap. And frankly, South American table wines ( Italy too ) represent amazing relative value, interest, quality and food durability versus our cheap wines. Many of which are made in the mirror of the flabby cults.

China was an odd market. Penfolds obviously smashed it but many Aussies sat on shelves for years beyond their expiry for their style.

We really seemed lost as an identity abroad.
Its been a domestic marketing pisstake for 20 years now.
Many wines are priced beyond annual inflation figures and way above an ROI of 7-9%...which the average punter would love to have on their savings, assets etc. Third party etailers are courting and the swamp is being drained through saving face deals, although septic 2017/20 vintages have made it very difficult for wineries, plus hard to retreat or concede that your product is overpriced with out similarly trashing your brand...so that may be the doom to which you refer.

I have no doubt that there are very good wines abroad for excellent VFM. Certainly when in country France and the bigger cities of Italy, it was a daily sport, to pick a few wines that I have little idea about, and more often than not the lottery threw up some very pleasant surprises.

I understand that its important for you Jamie to have Aussie wines viewed favourably in the international space, and yes many factors in getting it right, and equally many poor decisions has got it wrong, but its never been a focus to me.

Anyway, the industry doesn't need or is not interested in old farts like me, the're after the carefree younger supposed cashed up punters who think nothing on dropping three figures, paying exorbitant prices, just because some influencer said so :shock: :shock: :roll: :roll:

Just made my annual purchase from a small family run winery ( who stated they are largely unaffected by the Chines situation), who have not increased price from the previous 2-3 years. I suspect they are sitting in the 7-9% ROI and not in the stratosphere that other wineries place them selves in, because these wineries think they are extra special, seduced by critics and the like, who claim that punters should be paying far far more for their wares.
Give me a break!!

Cheers Craig
Tomorrow will be a good day

Chuck
Posts: 1329
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Chuck »

Bottom line. OZ can't rely on CCCP to keep fair trade open on a continuous basis. They have used tarrif on many of our quality produce as a negotiating/punishment tool. It didn't work for many items. However CCCP will continue to flex its muscles from time to time with impunity. OZ needs to seek alternative more reliable markets for produce CCCP will likely target regularly. Notice they haven't put tariffs on critical raw materials (iron ore, coal etc, gas etc)?

The whole way CCCP has changed since new regime has tried to flex its muscles has been very disappointing. They are chasing foreign investment but who would do business there now? Let's see how Tesla go as CCCP ramps up cheap EV production. I've heard many current foreign manufacturers are moving operations to more friendly jurisdictions.

The economy is stalling and the property market is in meltdown with prices going down. This should keep the CCCP awake at night.
Your worst game of golf is better than your best day at work

felixp21
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 10:32 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by felixp21 »

Trust me Chuck, it is. Very, very awake.
Ol' uncle Xi is crapping himself for the first time since he took power. Sadly, I think we are not too far away from another Tiananmen Square :cry:

Ian S
Posts: 2689
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:21 am
Location: Norwich, England

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Ian S »

p.s. I believe it's CCP. CCCP is the old acronym for the now defunct Soviet Union. :)

JamieAdelaide
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:59 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JamieAdelaide »

That’s my typo, if it matters, but the extra C could be used savagely and vulgarly to describe the thugs they are.

Ian S
Posts: 2689
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 3:21 am
Location: Norwich, England

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Ian S »

Agreed

Chuck
Posts: 1329
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Chuck »

I think the extra "C" could be added with it's derogatory meaning appropriate.
Your worst game of golf is better than your best day at work

JDSJDS
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:27 pm
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JDSJDS »


I Love Shiraz
Posts: 153
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 11:07 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: China Tariffs

Post by I Love Shiraz »

JamieAdelaide wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:04 am
phillisc wrote: Wed Mar 20, 2024 2:50 pm
I still think there is plenty of options in the domestic market...if only wineries here want to play.
Or that the recent mistake, where a few of us picked up Seppelts Sparking Shiraz for 80% off….
Aren’t you dooming the industry if you think domestic options involve your recent discounts? Now granted, it’s been a pricing and marketing pisstake locally for some time.

I spent two weeks a month in China for 20 years and now I spend two weeks a month in the USA. Wow! Fascinating to see where we may have gone wrong. Aussie wine in the USA was either cult or cheap as once the cult went away you are left with cheap. And frankly, South American table wines ( Italy too ) represent amazing relative value, interest, quality and food durability versus our cheap wines. Many of which are made in the mirror of the flabby cults.

China was an odd market. Penfolds obviously smashed it but many Aussies sat on shelves for years beyond their expiry for their style.

We really seemed lost as an identity abroad.
I totally agree we have lost our way overseas, particularly in the US market, where consumers associate us with cheap critter wines (Yellow Tail, etc.) and full-bodied red wines. Our marketing efforts need to focus on the diversity of our offering, with plenty of light to medium-bodied reds, as well as lovely Chardonnays and Rieslings.
Life is too short to drink rubbish wine.

Instagram: wine.by.michael

Sean
Posts: 1408
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 11:32 am

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Sean »

deleted
Last edited by Sean on Tue Jul 16, 2024 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JamieAdelaide
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:59 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JamieAdelaide »

Australia also has an unexpected competitor in China now. China! More and more I’m seeing Chinese wines lighting up the Hong Kong scene and marketing aggressive and patriotic.

This patriotism can also quickly roll toward another embargo. A US/ Australian regional military exercise to flex muscle in the Phillipines for example, bang, the soft belly of Aussie wine exports to China banned or trashed - by their mindless netizens.

Chuck
Posts: 1329
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2003 3:06 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Chuck »

JamieAdelaide wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:46 am Australia also has an unexpected competitor in China now. China! More and more I’m seeing Chinese wines lighting up the Hong Kong scene and marketing aggressive and patriotic.

This patriotism can also quickly roll toward another embargo. A US/ Australian regional military exercise to flex muscle in the Phillipines for example, bang, the soft belly of Aussie wine exports to China banned or trashed - by their mindless netizens.
Chinese vines have only been in for a short time so I question the quality at this time. Anyone have experience with any? Are the growing areas good for quality wines or just crappy over-irrigated bag-in-the-box stuff perfect for mixing with coca cola.
Your worst game of golf is better than your best day at work

JamieAdelaide
Posts: 395
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2022 3:59 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by JamieAdelaide »

The quality can be high. Certainly as high as some of our exports.

User avatar
phillisc
Posts: 3324
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:24 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: China Tariffs

Post by phillisc »

Well that is indeed interesting.
Wonder when the first Chinese wines (or at least if I have noticed), will reach Australia.
A delicious irony in light of Pennies/TWE (what else would you expect) quickly announcing that domestic prices will increase, as they have every year (nothing to do with tariffs just an annual convenience), due to increased international competition.
Put your wallets away folks...time to sit this one out a bit longer :wink: :wink:
Cheers Craig
Tomorrow will be a good day

Mahmoud Ali
Posts: 2954
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 9:00 pm
Location: Edmonton, Canada

Re: China Tariffs

Post by Mahmoud Ali »

Ian S wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:09 pm p.s. I believe it's CCP. CCCP is the old acronym for the now defunct Soviet Union. :)
Thank you, a welcome correction.

Post Reply