Michael McNally wrote: The general malignment and implied snobbery of some who say "yes, your journey will start with Shraz, but will end up with Burgundy" gives me the $hitS.
Still agree with this despite various interpretations emerging of "All Roads Lead To Rome/ All Roads Lead To Burgundy". A pretty clear assumption and to be honest the first time I heard this used was years ago and All Roads Lead To Bordeaux.
But make up interpretations as you please.
Is the All Roads Lead To Rome definition/ context true? No, not even close in my opinion, so I do wonder what the argument is? A lot of people do not even like pinot noir. Or, they don't like Old World pinot, preferring New. Or the don't like French wine culture or French food. Many just like drinking the wines of their country and refuse to budge on their journey.
Or even the ludicrous assumption that a large number will finish their journey in Burgundy style wines. Even the uber-rich, probably thankfully, don't see their journey ( if you could call it that ) end up in Burgundy or "Burgundy style". I see this from friends in the business jet game for tycoons. Bordeaux still dominates with Grange popular too.
What I do see up this way is the myth of Burgundy as the ultra-rich corner the market like a rare earth commodity. Hong Kong has played a big role in this and interestingly one of the guys in our tasting group changed the law in his political role- taking tax from 100% to 0% and as the owner of the most expensive cellar in Asia reduced his tax liability by millions ( explains why the streets are burning because of such favours ). This forever changed the market.
All Roads lead to Burgundy has fewer on the on the journey than many suspect. But Burgundy is often fiercely defended by the passionate- perhaps because its such an emotional and cerebral experience.