shauno wrote:rens wrote: (except for a week in 2011 when it was under water).
Wait, what? Do tell...
Brisbane floods. Not exactly under water, more lapping at the bottom of the bottle with humidity causing the label to slide down and on an angle.
shauno wrote:rens wrote: (except for a week in 2011 when it was under water).
Wait, what? Do tell...
shauno wrote:2008 Marques de Murrieta Rioja Reserva - Good & spicey, decanted for an hour or so & went well with BBQ'd
lamb shoulder. Impressive QPR for a 7-8 year old wine bought last week for under $30.
rens wrote:2009 Sorrenberg Gamay
Mike Hawkins wrote:swirler wrote:Mike. Wouldn't the youngest wine be the base? Probably not as I just had a (recent release AFAIK) 2002 predominant NV (come on mike, 'MV' is just marketing!) Superb Krug. Super Champagne full stop IMO. Each to their own....
Which ones would you describe as reductive?
The 06 would indeed be the base. I had another bottle last night, which was a similar blend. Really good wine. Had it alongside the 2003 which is growing on me (I wasn't initially a fan of it or the 2000).
swirler wrote:Mike Hawkins wrote:swirler wrote:Mike. Wouldn't the youngest wine be the base? Probably not as I just had a (recent release AFAIK) 2002 predominant NV (come on mike, 'MV' is just marketing!) Superb Krug. Super Champagne full stop IMO. Each to their own....
Which ones would you describe as reductive?
The 06 would indeed be the base. I had another bottle last night, which was a similar blend. Really good wine. Had it alongside the 2003 which is growing on me (I wasn't initially a fan of it or the 2000).
Mike, I found this on another forum that explains why the Krug I had was 'based' on the 2002 vintage:
"They are doing a re-release of the 2002 Grande Cuvee to correspond with the 2002 vintage release. This late release wine is now named the 158th edition as it is the 158th blend of a unique/different Grande Cuvee blend. Additionally, they previously did a limited late release of the 2002 based Grande Cuvee under the Equilbre name (rather than 158th edition)."
They don't do things the easy way, do they? For every 'rule' for French wine there are always exceptions.....
maybs wrote:2009 Giaconda Nebbiolo. My first try of their Nebbiolo and very happy with it. Could have easily mistaken it for a decent Italian. Went very well with 6 hour smoked/bbq'd beef ribs too.
JamieBahrain wrote:Hope you have more Cascina Francia in the cellar. Though 2009 Barolo relatively approachable, this will be a stunner in 15 years plus. No Monfortino in 2009 which generally serves CF well.
swirler wrote:maybs wrote:2009 Giaconda Nebbiolo. My first try of their Nebbiolo and very happy with it. Could have easily mistaken it for a decent Italian. Went very well with 6 hour smoked/bbq'd beef ribs too.
Yes, it's quite remarkable. Just like the rest of the range. Don't know how they do it!
TravisW wrote:Went out for some Japanese last night with the gang from work and had my first try of Brown Brothers Zibibbo. Light, refreshing, moreish and good bang for your buck. I think that it is the first wine-step for a mate of mine who only drinks cider. The thin edge of the wine-wedge.
Cheers, Travis.
griff wrote:TravisW wrote:Went out for some Japanese last night with the gang from work and had my first try of Brown Brothers Zibibbo. Light, refreshing, moreish and good bang for your buck. I think that it is the first wine-step for a mate of mine who only drinks cider. The thin edge of the wine-wedge.
Cheers, Travis.
Guilty pleasures. As good as many moscatos