Is There Really A Taste Difference Between Cheap and Expensive Wines?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/katiebell/2 ... ive-wines/
It got me thinking when a Tahbilk wine got similar scores to much more expensive wine in a recent off-line reported on here recently.
ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
Whilst true that taste is not an exact science, I think pricing is also not an exact science. The regular Tahbilk Cab Sauvs have been outstanding QPR for about as long as Tahbilk has been in existence.... as good as many other wineries' premium offerings. The 1986 was one of the more memorable wines of the past 12 months and for some the WOTN in Nov last year.
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
IMHO many a $100 wine I have tried has been infinitely better than any $2 or $10-chuck ... but twice as good as a superior $50 wine? 5x as good as the best of the $20 brigade of wines that over-deliver for price? Hmm.... then again there is a label show-off value to account for...
------------------------------------
Sam
Sam
- Gavin Trott
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 5:01 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
Wow, great timing! Just spent and (always) enjoyable time chatting with Mike Press.
Loves telling the story of last year's Adelaide Hills Wine Show.
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Shiraz of show ... $12.50 per bottle
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Wine of show ... $12.50 per bottle
Up against $50.00 reds, $60.00 reds, and +$100.00 reds from the likes of Henshke, Shaw and Smith etc etc.
So some judges couldn't tell the difference either :--)
.
Loves telling the story of last year's Adelaide Hills Wine Show.
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Shiraz of show ... $12.50 per bottle
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Wine of show ... $12.50 per bottle
Up against $50.00 reds, $60.00 reds, and +$100.00 reds from the likes of Henshke, Shaw and Smith etc etc.
So some judges couldn't tell the difference either :--)
.
regards
Gavin Trott
Gavin Trott
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
Gavin Trott wrote:Wow, great timing! Just spent and (always) enjoyable time chatting with Mike Press.
Loves telling the story of last year's Adelaide Hills Wine Show.
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Shiraz of show ... $12.50 per bottle
2010 Mike Press Shiraz, best Wine of show ... $12.50 per bottle
Up against $50.00 reds, $60.00 reds, and +$100.00 reds from the likes of Henshke, Shaw and Smith etc etc.
So some judges couldn't tell the difference either :--)
.
I have two cases of the 2010 Mike Press Shiraz - great stuff for drinking now and for the next couple of years.
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
I have a carton of the 2010 MP shiraz, but I prefer the Cab (2008.) Mike agrees. He told me that CS is the star of the vineyard.
I guess I'm lucky that Halliday turned me onto MPW early in my wine buying life and set the bar (QPR) for me. I am eternally grateful to JH and MP!
I guess I'm lucky that Halliday turned me onto MPW early in my wine buying life and set the bar (QPR) for me. I am eternally grateful to JH and MP!
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
I found I preferred the MP cab to the shiraz too.
Re: ARTICLE: Is There Really A Taste Difference.....?
Yes the Cab is a more elegant wine. Also my pick.
never underestimate the predictability of stupidity